100% PASS QUIZ 2025 THE BEST PECB LATEST ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR EXAM OBJECTIVES

100% Pass Quiz 2025 The Best PECB Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Objectives

100% Pass Quiz 2025 The Best PECB Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Objectives

Blog Article

Tags: Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Objectives, Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Topics, Review ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Guide, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Test Preparation, Popular ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exams

In our lives, we will encounter many choices. Some choices are so important that you cannot treat them casually. The more good choice you choose in your life, the more successful you are. Perhaps our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam guide can be your correct choice. Our study guide is different from common test engine. Also, the money you have paid for our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Guide will not be wasted. We sincerely hope that our test engine can teach you something. Of course, you are bound to benefit from your study of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice material.

Will you feel nervous in facing the real exam? ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Soft test engine can stimulate the real exam environment, so that you can know what the real exam is like,you’re your nerves will be reduced, at the same time, your confidence will be strengthened. In addition, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Soft test engine can install in more than 200 computers, and it supports MS operating system, and it has two modes for practicing. We offer you free demo for ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Soft test engine, you can have a try before buying, so that you can have a better understanding of what you are going to buy. You can enjoy free update for 365 days, and the update version for ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam materials will be sent to you automatically.

>> Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Objectives <<

High-quality Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Objectives & Leader in Qualification Exams & Complete PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam

There are plenty of platforms that have been offering ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam practice questions. You have to be vigilant and choose the reliable and trusted platform for ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation and the best platform is TestkingPDF. On this platform, you will get the valid, updated, and ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam exam expert-verified exam questions. ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Questions are real and error-free questions that will surely repeat in the upcoming ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam exam and you can easily pass the finalISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam even with good scores.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
Topic 2
  • AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
  • IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.
Topic 3
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
Topic 4
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 5
  • Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q94-Q99):

NEW QUESTION # 94
Audit evidence must be:

  • A. Refutable
  • B. Physical
  • C. Structured
  • D. Verifiable

Answer: D

Explanation:
Audit evidencemust beobjective and verifiable, meaning that it can beconfirmed through observation, documentation, or reproducible results. This is a foundational principle of auditing as per:
* ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 3.8defines audit evidence as "records, statements of fact or other information which arerelevant to the audit criteria and verifiable."
* This principle is also emphasized in ISO/IEC 42001 during internal audits (Clause 9.2), ensuring that conclusions are based onfactual, traceable, and confirmabledata.
Verifiability ensures the credibility and reliability of audit findings, especially critical in evaluating AIMS due to the complexity and potential subjectivity of AI behaviors.


NEW QUESTION # 95
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and copyright its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formalrequest, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Question:
Based on Scenario 9, what should Securisai's certification be?

  • A. Withdrawn
  • B. Transferred
  • C. Suspended

Answer: B

Explanation:
Securisai requested atransferof its certification from one certification body to another, which is fully legitimate.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.5supports certificate transfer under defined conditions, ensuring the organization remains certified without interruption.
* TheIAF MD2 (Mandatory Document for Management of Transfers of Accredited Certification) further elaborates:"A valid certification may be transferred between certification bodies provided that the original certification remains valid." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.5; IAF MD2 Guidelines.


NEW QUESTION # 96
Which core element focuses on ensuring that the creators and operators of AI systems are responsible for the outcomes and impacts of those systems?

  • A. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
  • B. Accountability
  • C. Privacy and Security
  • D. Safety and Reliability

Answer: B

Explanation:
Accountabilityis the core principle that ensures individuals or organizations involved in thedesign, development, and deploymentof AI systems areresponsible for their outcomes, decisions, and impacts.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 5.3andClause 6.1.2, accountability requires organizations to define roles and responsibilities, ensure that systems are monitored for risks, and establishescalation or remediation procedureswhen negative impacts occur.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1highlights accountability as a key requirement for maintaining trust, legal compliance, and ensuring AI systems operate under clear lines ofgovernance and oversight.


NEW QUESTION # 97
Question:
Which of the following describes a joint audit?

  • A. When two or more auditing organizations cooperate to audit a single auditee
  • B. When two or more management systems are audited together at a single auditee
  • C. When an internal audit and a third-party audit are conducted simultaneously
  • D. When audits are conducted back-to-back for efficiency

Answer: A

Explanation:
AJoint Auditis when two or more audit organizationscooperateto audit the same auditee.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.9defines joint audit as:"An audit carried out by two or more auditing organizations cooperating to audit a single auditee."
* This is further echoed in ISO/IEC 42001:2023, which supports joint audits especially inmulti-country and consortium environments (Clause 9.2.1 reference to audit scope management).
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.9; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1.


NEW QUESTION # 98
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 7, the audit team conducted a Stage 2 audit after a considerable time from Stage 1. Is this recommended?

  • A. No, the Stage 2 audit should be conducted immediately after the Stage 1 audit to quickly address any identified issues
  • B. No, the gap between Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits should be minimal (usually two weeks) to ensurethat the AIMS remains consistent and relevant during the audit process
  • C. Yes, a bigger gap between Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits allows the audit team time for reflection and preparation in addressing the findings

Answer: B

Explanation:
Aminimal gapbetween Stage 1 and Stage 2 is strongly recommended.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.3.1.2states:"The interval between Stage 1 and Stage 2 should be short to avoid changes to system implementation or operating conditions."
* TheISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Guiderecommendsa maximum gap of 90 days, preferably 2-3 weeks, to ensure continuity.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.3.1.2; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide Section 6 ("Audit Timing and Continuity").


NEW QUESTION # 99
......

Most customers reflected that our PECB exam questions cover most of questions of actual test. So if you decided to choose ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor as your study materials, you just need to spend your spare time to practice ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps PDF and remember the points of pass exam guide. Our latest vce dumps are the guarantee of clear exam.

Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Topics: https://www.testkingpdf.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-testking-pdf-torrent.html

Report this page